Compare stock clutch to HiT Clutch – Field Test – GY6

Compare stock clutch to HiT Clutch – Field Test

Compare stock clutch to HiT Clutch - image cover

Field Test

To compare various data between stock (conventional) clutch and High Thrust Clutch.

Application: Veypor Analysis Software

The Veypor Analysis Software constitutes a component of the Veypor motorcycle performance data acquisition system. Aimed at assisting riders in accurately gathering and analyzing their motorcycle’s performance data, it boasts functionalities like horsepower and torque plotting, lap timing, and speed measurement. These features render it an indispensable asset for both everyday riders and performance aficionados.

Condition

  • Weight: 210 kg.
  • Wheel Circumference (Cir): 1,378 mm.
  • Shift Point: 10,000 rpm.
  • Scooter Model: Kymco VP125 (GY6).

What did it record?

  • Maximum HorsePower.
  • Maximum Torque.
  • Maximum Velocity.
  • 0~80 km/hr time.
  • 0~20m time.
  • 0~100m time.
  • 0~200m time.
  • 0~300m time.
  • 0~400m time.

Comparison

Conclusively speaking, High Thrust Clutch has obvious advantage in every aspect; while there was 2~5% improvement speed-wise, we saw superb 15~ 19% improvement regarding maximum horsepower and torque.

Compare stock clutch to HiT Clutch - 0~400m time
Compare stock clutch to HiT Clutch - horsepower, torqe, velocity
RecordStock ClutchHiT ClutchDifference
Maximum Horsepower8.3618 kW9.7687 kWUP 16.83%
Maximum Torque10.7988 N-m12.8010 N-mUP 18.54%
Maximum Velocity88.5110 km/hr91.4410 km/hrUP 3.31%
0~80 km/hr time13.5122 sec13.1686 secSave 2.54%
0~20m time2.5209 sec2.3979 secSave 4.88%
0~100m time7.6457 sec7.4818 secSave 2.14%
0~200m time12.5046 sec12.2587 secSave 1.97%
0~300m time16.9129 sec16.5440 secSave 2.18%
0~400m time21.1855 sec20.6937 secSave 2.32%

In “0-20m time”, thank for the effective engagement, much less slippage and more acceleration, High Thrust Clutch got absolute advantage in the very beginning, which showed 4.88% time-saving or simply said 4.88% FASTER. Later, since there was no such “slippery contact” period, the improvement rate was slightly adjusted.

1.1~ 1.4 seconds after the take-off, both stock and HiT Clutch reached the peak value of torque, which then went down along with the rise of speed. In the aspect of torque, HiT Clutch won 18.54% over the stock one, as the contribution of shorter slippage duration as well as the “HiT-unique” thrust force by Push Pins.

Take a look at the time throughout the entire experiment, we found that the longer distance we travelled, the more speed difference we saw between these two clutches. Roughly speaking, HiT Clutch performed from 0.1 second faster to 0.5 seconds faster than the stock one. Shown in the Comparison Figure, the distance between blue line (stock clutch) and red line (HiT Clutch) became wider along with the timeline.

Both clutches reached a speed of 80 km/hr when they travelled to 200~ 300 m. And at the end of the whole route, a distance of 400m from start, the meter showed the top end for both clutches were 88.51 km/hr (stock clutch) and 91.44 km/hr (HiT Clutch).

Compare stock clutch to HiT Clutch - Torque curve
Compare stock clutch to HiT Clutch - velocity curve